I know its usually the environment of business travellers, road warriors and perhaps alcoholics; but I enjoy dining out on my own. This is not to say that I do not thoroughly enjoy cogent and stimulating dinner table conversation. However we increasingly live in a crass, déclassé world of reality television, check-out aisle gossip and over indulgent blog personalities.
But sitting in a restaurant, often busy not only indulges my Aspergian quirks of preferring some alone time but also helps me practice enveloping myself in what is essentially a high-anxiety environment.
For someone with acute senses, the cacophony, myriad scents, and ambient rise in temperature can make for a discomforting environment. Yet it allows the opportunity to partake in one of humanity’s favourite past times – People Watching.
Homo Sapiens Sapiens are social creatures. Our species thrives on interpersonal activity, be it good or bad. This quality of personality shared by people is the sole reason tabloid magazines, celebrity culture, and arguably popular entertainment exists. That and the propensity for people to judge the behaviour of others.
So as I sit at my table-for-one, sipping on a glass of non-vintage champagne and take bites of my beet root tarte tartin; I sit back and look around the dining room. This is part-mindfulness technique to keep anxiety at bay but also part-personal enjoyment. I take in my surroundings.
The first thing you would notice is EVERYONE is talking. At some tables, quite animatedly.
I seriously doubt it is about Targeted RNA Recombinations; or the lesser known works of Verdi; or the architectural significance of St Paul’s Cathedral (City of London). I suppose, as anyone has experienced, it all does not matter what is being discussed as long as the talker has an audience and is engaged. No one is whipping out peer-reviewed journals or encyclopaedias to fact-check their dining companions’ words.
This is the world that has created the blogger, Youtube commentators, and what seems like the 60-second news cycle.
Instant Response is preferred to intellectual accomplishment. Cynically one would assume that this is the aim of social media and mass communication today.
Part of the inspiration behind putting these thoughts into words has been spurred by a recent example of how bloggers/social media can overreact and quickly change the parameters of a situation. Charlotte Dawson (television personality, former model, stylish dresser and fantastic woman who is not afraid to speak her mind) recently made a humorous comment regarding BryanBoy a fashion blogger on twitter. This was then perceived, incredulously so as a ‘death threat’ by another fashion blogger and instantly decided to start a one-woman crusade which allegedly resulted in BryanBoy contacting the police in fear of his life. As social media begins to become the primary source of information in people’s lives (in my experience one can confirm an Earthquake by checking your Twitter timeline or Facebook newsfeed faster than by checking the United States Geological Survey’s earthquake reports); more and more examples will show how the internet is a poor forum for public communication.
It lacks nuance of oratory, and living with Asperger’s I know very well the problems that not understanding facets of speech like sarcasm and subtlety can be damaging.
Whether or not the fashion blogger truly overreacted it still increased, for a few hours at least, attention and possibly view counts for their respective blogs. In a world where the number of Twitter followers or ‘likes’ your Facebook fan page has equates some sort of power, the tactic of sensationalist, yellow journalism has been updated for the 21st century.
Remember the days when news media sought the opinions of experts for commentary on the events that were being reported on as opposed to check to see what people are saying on Twitter?
So I come back to my seat at the restaurant. Not being part of the conversation allows one to stop and think. Granted I have the fortunate benefit of time and financial security to take the time to stop and observe, and check out all the facts. Quite often ‘Best Top 10 Lists’ fall afoul of the sensationalist dinner party conversation as everyone has an opportunity to be involved regardless of the fact they are credible to comment on the topic. An extreme example of the lengths I’d go to ‘fact-check’ the opinions of others was dining at Alain Ducasse’s flagship Parisian restaurant at the Plaza Athenee one night, then taking the TGV down the next day so I could have dinner at his Le Louis XV in Monte Carlo and make the comparison as to which one was really better with the culinary experience still fresh in my memory. I know this is hardly something that the majority of individuals can attempt; but making sure I have all the data before I come to a conclusion is very, very important to me.
So next time you’re at dinner and you’re eagerly engaged in gossip-mongering, pop-political punditry, or debating the top 5 sports franchises in the world, think before you speak. And who knows you may find yourself more captivating and persuasive. And most importantly, gain my approval :-P
Jenevieve Haughson
xoxo
Ps: Why don’t people dress up anymore to dine out? I know as a society there is a trend to move towards a breakdown of classes and egalitarianism but women really dress shoddily these days. I personally will never understand the deconstructed look. And when did men stop pressing their trousers?
PPS: Reading “Peach Bellini” on menus really is a major pet peeve of mine. That is like saying ‘ATM Machine’ or ‘PIN Number’
PPPS: I do realize that it is somewhat hypocritical and disingenuous so criticize the dissemination of unsubstantiated opinion on a blog. But whatever :-P

